It's a brilliant game though, if you can get your head around its age. It won't have the same impact it had back in 1998 but it's definately worth playing and I also prefer it to Half-Life 2 (probably nostalgia more than anything though). A small warning though, the first game is much more difficult and unforgiving than the second.

It's a cool expansion to the Half-Life series but it is best played with a partner. I prefer the PS2 version than the port for the PC version which sucks since they edited some stuff. Do you need 2 players to play the game? (and if you have to can you play splitscreen?) Yes you actually need a 2nd player. Talk from personal expirience For half life 1 it was the AI that was jaw dropping at the time so yeah its the fighting mechanics. Half life 2 onwards one thing that improved greatly was visual story telling scenes like where u find zombies outside a door and u go into the room via the vents and find a corpse with a gun in its hand. 4. alexanderpete.
Black mesa is basically a reimagining of half life 1. Same game and story just better in a ton of ways. half life, half life 2 to get the feel of the source engine, then black mesa if you want. Honestly, although Half Life is a really amazing game and all, Black Mesa would honestly be better.
Half-Life. Back in 1998, Half-Life’s storytelling and the conviction of its fictional world were far beyond anything else in the genre. The Longest Journey’s sequel Dreamfall is also worth
. 477 172 363 441 399 197 101 58

is half life 2 worth playing